# SAHIL vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Citation: CRM-M 36284/2026
Petitioner: SAHIL
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=36284&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-13&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36284-2026 Date of Decision:13.07.2026 Sahil …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Deepak Kundu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the second petition under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in case FIR No.283, dated 20.09.2025, registered under Sections 109(1), 190, 191(3), 351(2), 351(3) of B.N.S,{corresponding Sections 307, 149,148,506 of IPC} and 25 (1-B)(a), 27 of Arms Act, later on added Sections 3(5) of B.N.S(34 of IPC), Police Station I.M.T Rohtak, District Rohtak (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the present case and arrested on 22.09.2025. He further contends that initially the police had arrested the petitioner and Sunny in the present case, however, Sunny co-accused has already been granted the concession of bail by Juvenile Justice Board, Rohtak, vide order dated 28.01.2026 (Annexure P-3). He further submits that in the

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/sahil-vs-state-of-haryana