# ROHIT ALIAS ROHIT SHARMA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CRM-M 24075/2026
Petitioner: ROHIT ALIAS ROHIT SHARMA
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=24075&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-24075-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (206) CRM-M-24075-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Rohit @ Rohit Sharma ... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 (Section 438 Cr.P.C.) in case bearing FIR No.0113 dated 10.04.2026 under Sections 21(b) NDPS Act, 1985 later on added Sections 27-A, 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 30.04.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of the order dated 30.04.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the interim order dated 30.04.2026 is SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.16 18:32 made absolute. I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ch

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/rohit-alias-rohit-sharma-vs-state-of-haryana