# REENA KUMARI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-15
Citation: CRM-M 16330/2022
Petitioner: REENA KUMARI AND ANOTHER
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=16330&case_year=2022&order_date=2026-07-15&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1 CRM-M-16330-2022 (O&M) 134 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16330-2022 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.07.2026 REENA KUMARI AND ANOTHER …Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate and Mr. Abhinav Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG Haryana. Mr. Jaskaran Chhatwal, Advocate for respondent No. 2. (through video conferencing) *** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 0057 dated 28.01.2022 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 427, 506 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sonipat City, District Sonipat and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. 2. Complainant/respondent No. 2 Satish Kumar son of Sarup Singh resident of Ashok Vihar Gohana Road, Sonipat made a complaint to the police stating that their case was pending in the Court and the next date of hearing was 26.04.2022. On 13.01.2022, Mukesh, Reena, father of Reena, brother of Reena and friend of Mukesh came along with police, with an order that the plot was vacant, where building material of Mukesh and Reena was lying and no disturbance be caused in the work. Pol

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/reena-kumari-and-another-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another