# RAM SINGH vs PARMOD KUMAR AND ORS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Citation: FAO 3234/2002
Petitioner: RAM SINGH
Respondent: PARMOD KUMAR AND ORS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=FAO&case_no=3234&case_year=2002&order_date=2026-07-13&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

-1- 269 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-3234-2002 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 RAM SINGH ....Appellant Versus PARMOD KUMAR AND ORS ...Respondents FAO-3233-2002 MAYA RAM ....Appellant Versus NIRMAL SINGH AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None for the appellant (in both appeals). Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate & Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for Mr. Ram Avtar, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance company (in both appeals) PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present appeals have been preferred by unsuccessful injured appellants-claimants being aggrieved by award dated 28.03.2002 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’), as their claim petitions seeking compensation for injuries suffered in accident dated 14.07.1998 were dismissed by learned Tribunal. 2. Learned Tribunal had concluded that since the appellants- claimants have failed to prove rash and negligent driving on the part of RAVINDER DHANIA 2026.07.18 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-3234-2002 FAO-3233-2002 -2- maruti car bearing No.DL-4C-7570 (hereinafter referred to as ‘offending vehicle’) 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/ram-singh-vs-parmod-kumar-and-ors