# RAKESH KUMARI vs HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD AND ANR

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CWP 13119/2019
Petitioner: RAKESH KUMARI
Respondent: HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD AND ANR

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=13119&case_year=2019&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CWP-13119-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Rakesh Kumari ....Petitioner Versus Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. and Another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik and Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocates for the petitioner Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate for the respondents ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that the 3rd ACP granted to the petitioner has been withdrawn on account of she having forgone the promotion for 2 years to the post of Personal Assistant. In this regard, he relies on the judgment passed by the Division Bench in Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and Others vs. Sadhu Ram, LPA-333-2014, decided on 10.03.2014. He prays that her claim be re-considered in terms thereof. 2. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents would not be averse to have a relook at the matter and decided afresh, expeditiously, in accordance with law, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 3. 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/rakesh-kumari-vs-haryana-vidyut-prasaran-nigam-ltd-and-anr