# RAKESH KUMAR ALIAS ROCKY vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-17
Citation: CRM-M 35068/2026
Petitioner: RAKESH KUMAR ALIAS ROCKY
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=35068&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-17&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M No.35068 of 2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 CRM-M No.35068 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:17.07.2026 Rakesh Kumar @ Rocky ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Randeep Singh Waraich, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): For the benefit of anticipatory bail, the instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, in a case arising out of the FIR No.125 dated 29.05.2026, under Sections 308(2), 61(2) [Section 249 added later on] of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25 & 27 of Arms Act, Police Station City Batala, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur. 2. The abovementioned FIR came into being at the instance of 'Tejbr Singh', hereinafter being referred to as 'complainant' only. It was stated by the complainant that he is a resident of Batala and running three restaurants, namely ‘RIFLE-18 Cafe’, ‘RIFLE-18 Rooftop’ and ‘RIFLE-18 Palassio’, in Batala. As per complainant, few days before the occurrence, co-accused ‘Pawan Gurdaspuria’

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/rakesh-kumar-alias-rocky-vs-state-of-punjab