# RAJPAL SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CWP 11036/2008
Petitioner: RAJPAL SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=11036&case_year=2008&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

2026-PHHC.095514 Fee ae = IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 591 CWP-11036-2008 (O & M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 RAJPAL SINGH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A. G. Haryana. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of the fact that on the basis of the interim order dated 17.07.2009, the petitioner continued in service and retired on attaining the age of superannuation, whereafter he was even granted the retiral benefits, and the same may be disposed of as such. 2. Ordered accordingly. 14.07.2026 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.14 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and ord Kedgment.

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/rajpal-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors