# RAJ KUMAR @ MONA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-17
Citation: CRM-M 31617/2026
Petitioner: RAJ KUMAR @ MONA
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=31617&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-17&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

109 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-31617 of 2026 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 Raj Kumar alias Mona ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Satbir Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner(s) [Through Hybrid Mode]. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No. 109 dated 10.04.2026, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 21(b) of ‘the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985’, Police Station Cityy Mandi Dabwali, District Dabwali, Haryana. 2. Vide order dated 29.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. 3. Heard. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/raj-kumar-mona-vs-state-of-haryana