# RAHUL vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CRM-M 35066/2026
Petitioner: RAHUL
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=35066&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35066-2026 Date of Decision : 14.07 2026 Date of uploading: 15.07.2026 RAHUL ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present : Ms. Suman Kumari, Sandeep, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate, for the complainant. **** Sumeet Goel, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (corresponding Section 439 Cr.P.C.) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.306 dated 21.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(1), 115, 191(3), 190 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 (Erstwhile Section 302, 321, 148, 149, 120-B of Indian Penal Code 1860) (Section 61(2) BNS 2023/120-B IPC 1860 added lateron) at Police Station City Narwana, District Jind. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks to withdraw the petition in hand, at this stage. 3. Ordered accordingly. (SUMEET GOEL) 14.07.2026 JUDGE Vandana Yadav Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No VANDANA YADAV Whether Reportable. : Yes/No 202

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/rahul-vs-state-of-haryana-punjab-haryana-2