# RAHUL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-15
Citation: CRA-S 2242/2026
Petitioner: RAHUL
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRA-S&case_no=2242&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-15&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-2242-2026 DECIDED ON: 15.07.2026 RAHUL .....APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. Ravi Kumar Girdhwal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG, Haryana. SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been moved by the appellant, challenging the order dated 25.06.2026 passed by learned Vacation Judge-cum- Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, whereby application for anticipatory bail filed by the appellant was dismissed, in case, FIR No.100 dated 27.05.2026 under sections 115(2), 127(2), 140(3), 351(3) read with section 3(5) of BNS and sections 3(1)(r) and 3(2)Va of SC/ST Act, registered at Police Station Sector 6, Bahadurgarh. 2. Without addressing the merits of the case in detail, learned counsel for the appellant submits that, subsequent to the registration of FIR, parties have amicably resolved their dispute and entered into a compromise. It is contended that, in view of the said settlement, custodial interrogation of the appellant is no longer necessary and, rather, may adversely affect the cordial relations now restored bet

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/rahul-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another