# PAVAN SHARMA ALIAS PAWAN SHARMA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CRM-M 28416/2026
Petitioner: PAVAN SHARMA ALIAS PAWAN SHARMA
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=28416&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-28416-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 CRM-M-28416-2026 Decided on: 16.07.2026 Pavan Sharma @ Pawan Sharma …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Ms. Samriti, Advocate (through V.C.) for Mr. Shubham Jain, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aditiya Pal Singla, AAG Haryana Mr. Shailesh Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. Ankush Aggarwal, Advocate for complainant-respondent No. 2 **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of FIR No. 89, dated 21.12.2025, u/s 406/420/120-B IPC (Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, 2023) at Police Station Cyber Cell, Fatehabad. 2. On 19.05.2026, following order was passed: “(i) xx xx xx xx 2. As per the allegations, respondent No.2/complainant, namely Meeta Gupta, and petitioner’s wife, namely Nirmal Singh alias Mannat, were well acquainted and shared cordial relations. It is alleged that on the assurance extended by the petitioner’s wife, complainant deposite

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/pavan-sharma-alias-pawan-sharma-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another