# NATHU RAM YADAV vs EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, THROUGH CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Citation: CWP 20844/2026
Petitioner: NATHU RAM YADAV
Respondent: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, THROUGH CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=20844&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-13&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 112 CWP-20844-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 NATHU RAM YADAV ... Petitioner VERSUS EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, THROUGH CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Jayant Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Keerti Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel relies upon the judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court passed in ‘The Employees Provident Fund Organization and another etc. Versus Sunil Kumar B. and others’ and states that the legal notice of the petitioner dated 12.04.2026, Annexure P-6 be decided in light thereof in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the concerned Authority of the respondents to look into and decide the legal notice dated 12.04.2026, Annexure P-6 within six months in accordance with law taking note of the aforesaid judgment, which this Court has no reason

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/nathu-ram-yadav-vs-employees-provident-fund-organisation-through-central-provident-fund-commissioner-and-ors