# MOHIT vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CRM-M 22013/2026
Petitioner: MOHIT
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=22013&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-22013-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 231 CRM-M-22013-2026 Decided on : 14.07.2026 Mohit . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. Prikshit Singla, Advocate and Mr. Ranvir Parashar, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, AAG, Haryana. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:- Name of FIR Date Section(s) Police Station District Petitioner(s) No. Mohit 304 12.09.2025 S. 109, 3(5), 111(4), 111(5), 238, City Thanesar Kurukshetra 253, 308(4) of BNS, 2023 [corresponding S. 307, 201, 216, 387, 34 of IPC] and S. 25/29-54-59 of Arms Act, 1959 2. A gist of allegations, as summed up by the trial Court, is reproduced here-under:- “The factual matrix of the present case is that the complainant Mohit Gupta moved an application to the police to the effect that he was posted as Manager at an immigration ce

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/mohit-vs-state-of-haryana-punjab-haryana-2