# MEENU PATLE vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CRM-M 13904/2026
Petitioner: MEENU PATLE
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=13904&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-13904-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 CRM-M-13904-2026 Date of Decision : 14.07.2026 MEENU PATLE …. PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER …. RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr.Abhimanyu Choudhary, Advocate and Mr. Vikas Bairagi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in a case bearing FIR No.382 dated 29.09.2025, under Sections 406 and 420 IPC registered at Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula. 2. The allegations against the petitioner and her husband are that they have embezzled approximately Rs.83 lakhs belonging to the complainant out of which a sum of Rs.60 lakhs was taken by them on the pretext of investing the same for better profits. The prosecution, in fact, says that they had taken Rs.1 Crore from the complainant but returned Rs.17 lakhs only to her. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that contents of FIR in question are false and have been manipulated by the complainant ANJU GOEL 2026.07.14 16:56 as per her convenience; that the petitioner has repaid a

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/meenu-patle-vs-state-of-haryana