# MANDEEP KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CWP 20969/2026
Petitioner: MANDEEP KAUR
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=20969&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20969-2026 Date of Decision : 14.07.2026 MANDEEP KAUR .....Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : Mr. Kehar Singh Hissawal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. The main grievance which propelled the present petitioner to approach this Court by casting instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is the indolent and lackadaisical approach of the authority concerned, in not deciding her representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-10). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, in case a mandamus is passed upon respondents, to take a final decision on her representation (supra), in a time bound manner. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel, who is present in Court, on an advance notice, submits that he has no objection, if the aforesaid direction is passed upon the respondent authorities. DHARAM VIR 2026.07.14 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-20969-2026 -2- 4. In view of the a

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/mandeep-kaur-vs-state-of-punjab-and-ors