# MALKIAT SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CRWP 7190/2026
Petitioner: MALKIAT SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRWP&case_no=7190&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 203 CRWP-7190-2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 MALKIAT SINGH ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Gursharanjit Singh Chanota and Ms. Ruby Kaur, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for respondent Nos.10 and 11. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State Counsel refers to Paragraph No.4 of the Status Report dated 13.07.2026 filed by Mr. Gaurav Yadav, IPS, Director General of Police, Punjab, wherein it has been mentioned that an SIT headed by S.P. (Investigation), Hoshiarpur stands constituted and respondent No.9, against whom allegations have been levelled, has been nominated as accused as stated in paragraph No.9 (vi) and insofar as the threat perception is concerned, in that regard, paragraph No.11 is relevant which reads thus: RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:23 I am the author of this document CRWP-7190-2026 -2- “11. That Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur has further reported that threat perception analysis of the petitioner has revealed there is no threat to the petitioner which 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/malkiat-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others