# M/s.Municipal Commissioner, vs The Regional Provident Fund

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Petitioner: M/s.Municipal Commissioner,
Respondent: The Regional Provident Fund

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/2090721)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

W.P(MD)No.19666 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P(MD)No.19666 of 2026 and WMP (MD) No.14538 of 2026 M/s.Municipal Commissioner, Virudhachalam Municipality, Virudhachalam – 605 652. Through its Commissioner. ... Petitioner(s) vs. 1. The Regional Provident Fund, Commissioner II, Employees Provident Fund Organization, P.B.No.588, Sree Complex D Block, No.18, Madurai Road, Trichy-620 008. 2. Enforcement Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization, No.4-6, Jawans Bhavan Building, Lawrence Road, Thirupathiripuliyur, 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2026 03:13:05 pm ) W.P(MD)No.19666 of 2026 Cuddalore-607 002. 3. M/s. Viruthambigai Mahalir, Self Help Group No.59, South Street, Pennadam Road, Virudhachalam- 606001. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondent not to consider the petitioner as the Principal Employer and not to claim the dues of the third respondent from the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr. C.Karthikeyan For R1 & R2 : Mr.I.Pinai

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/m-s-municipal-commissioner-vs-the-regional-provident-fund