# ISHWAR CHANDER AND OTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CWP 7978/2019
Petitioner: ISHWAR CHANDER AND OTHER
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=7978&case_year=2019&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 252 CWP-7978-2019 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 ISHWAR CHANDER AND OTHERS ... Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Jitender Singh Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 and 6. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners had been promoted to the post of Clerk with a condition that increment and further promotion would be subject to passing typing test, however, the same was not taken, instead they were insisted to clear SETC test, thus reverted which was stayed on 26.03.2019. Similarly circumstanced employees, who were junior to them were also reverted on the same ground, however, the said order has been withdrawn on 27.06.2024 by stating therein that increment for the post of Clerk will be allowed only after qualifying/passing the SETC test Part-I and Part-II. 2. In view of above, the matter needs to be reconsidered and they have no objection in case the above condition is imposed in their case as well, except petitioner No.7, 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/ishwar-chander-and-other-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others
