# GEETIKA CHAWLA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CRM-M 29187/2026
Petitioner: GEETIKA CHAWLA
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=29187&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-29187-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 246 CRM-M-29187-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:14.07.2026 Geetika Chawla ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepinder Singh, Advocate and Ms. Simerpreet Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. ... Manisha Batra, J. (Oral). 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking benefit of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.391, dated 29.10.2025, registered under Section 22 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and Sections 319(2), 217, 248(b), 3(5), 61(2), 318(4), 340, 335(3), 308(6), 238(c), 308(2), 308(7), 338 of the BNS (offences punishable under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Sections 137, 351(3) of the BNS were deleted lateron), at Police Station Sector-65, Gurugram. 2. The aforementioned FIR was initially registered under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 137 and 351(3) of the BNS on the basis of a complaint which was submitted by the complainant while HARJEET KAUR 2026.07.14 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and in

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/geetika-chawla-vs-state-of-haryana