# DR. ANURAG BHARTI THROUGH MRS. RAJNI vs VEENA KANT MANCHANDA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Citation: CR 4429/2026
Petitioner: DR. ANURAG BHARTI THROUGH MRS. RAJNI
Respondent: VEENA KANT MANCHANDA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CR&case_no=4429&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-13&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 165 CR-4429-2026 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Dr. Anurag Bharti . . . . Petitioner Vs. Veena Kant Manchanda and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - Mr.Suresh Kumar Aneja, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. The petitioner-defendant No.2 has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 16.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fazilka, whereby his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint of civil suit [CS-407-2023] on the ground of deficient court fee has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the plaintiff has sought declaration of ownership along with a declaration that the transfer deed dated 27.02.2020 executed by defendant No.2 in favour of defendant No.6 is illegal, null and void and not binding upon her rights, besides possession of the suit property. It is argued that unless ad valorem court fee on the value of the transfer deed is paid, such a suit is not maintainable

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/dr-anurag-bharti-through-mrs-rajni-vs-veena-kant-manchanda-and-others