# DEEPAK CHOPRA vs PUNEET CHOPRA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-15
Citation: CR 697/2023
Petitioner: DEEPAK CHOPRA
Respondent: PUNEET CHOPRA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CR&case_no=697&case_year=2023&order_date=2026-07-15&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CR-697-2023 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-697-2023 Deepak Chopra ...Peoner Versus Puneet Chopra ...Respondent Reserved on: 14.07.2026 Pronounced on: 15.07.2026 Pronounced fully/opera.ve part: Fully CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Argued by: Mr. H.S. Baidwan, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Shukla, Advocate for the respondent. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. The plainff has invoked the supervisory/revisional jurisdicon of this Court under Arcle 227 of the Constuon of India, to assail the order dated 04.01.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh, whereby the applicaon filed by the defendant in Civil Suit bearing CS-2134-2015, seeking permission to take on record the wri=en statement was allowed. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the pares and have perused the record. 3. It is contended by Ld. Counsel for the peoner - plainff that the learned Trial Court commi=ed jurisdiconal error in allowing the applicaon filed by the defendant for taking on record the wri=en statement, because the defendant had appeared in the suit as early as the year 2016. Inst

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/deepak-chopra-vs-puneet-chopra