# Chandthrayee vs State represented by, Inspector of Police,

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Petitioner: Chandthrayee
Respondent: State represented by, Inspector of Police,

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1349548)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

Crl.O.P.No.18098 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.07.2026 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.18098 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.12082 of 2026 1. Chandthrayee 2. Dheenadayalan .. Petitioners Versus 1. State represented by Inspector of Police, Edappadi Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No.16 of 2026) 2. Jothi Meena .. Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.16 of 2026, dated 14.01.2026 on the file of 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.John Josh For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate (Criminal Side), for R1 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/07/2026 02:55:47 pm ) Crl.O.P.No.18098 of 2026 ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the first respondent would submit that already, the investigation, in this case, has been completed and the F.I.R is closed as ‘mistake of fact’ and the Final Report will also be filed shortly filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate. 2. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is di

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/chandthrayee-vs-state-represented-by-inspector-of-police