# ANIL KUMAR vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CRM-M 32772/2026
Petitioner: ANIL KUMAR
Respondent: STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=32772&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-32772-2026 1 119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32772-2026 Anil Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of Chandigarh (UT) ....Respondent Date of Decision: July 14, 2026 Date of Uploading: July 14, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Ms. Priya Saho, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor U.T., Chandigarh, Mr. Dixit Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr. Sarasmi Budhiraja, Advocate and Mr. Arjun Garg, Advocate for the respondent. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No.0023 dated 06.02.2026, registered under Sections 115(2), 140(3), 142, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 (Sections 103(1), 190, 191(1), 191(2), 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 added later on), at Police Station Sector 31, Chandigarh. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for sometime, seeks to withdraw the petition in hand. She has submitted that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned trial Court and shall apply for regular bail within a period of 01 week from today, & it is submitted that regular bail plea, if filed, be decided withi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/anil-kumar-vs-state-of-ut-chandigarh