# ANIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CRM-M 38499/2026
Petitioner: ANIL KUMAR
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=38499&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-38499-2026 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (165) CRM-M-38499-2026 (O & M) Date of decision:16.07.2026 Anil Kumar …... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and anr. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 528 BNSS (Section 482 Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the impugned order dated 01.02.2018 (Annexure P-1) declaring the petitioner a proclaimed person in case NI-1644-2015 and FIR No.525 dated 31.07.2019 under Section 174-A IPC (now Section 209 BNS, 2023) registered at Police Station Model Town, District Rewari (Annexure P-2) as well as all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. 2. The brief facts of the case are that a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was instituted against the accused- petitioner at the instance of the complainant respondent No.2-Tota Ram. As the accused-petitioner did not appear before the Trial Court to face trial, he was declared as a proclaimed person. Subsequently, the impugned order dated 01.02.2018 (Annexure P-1) and FIR No.525 dated 31.07.2019 under SUKHPRE

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/anil-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-and-anr-punjab-haryana-2