# AMRIK SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Citation: CRM-M 21415/2026
Petitioner: AMRIK SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=21415&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-13&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M-21415-2026 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 AMRIK SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Adeshwar S. Pannu, AAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (Section 438 Cr.P.C.) is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0019 dated 11.03.2026 under Sections 110 and 351(3) of BNS (Sections 308 and 506 IPC) registered at Police Station Sadar Kurali, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 20.04.2026 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of order dated 20.04.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In this view of the matter, interim order dated 20.04.2026 is made absolute. KUSUM 2026.07.14 11:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-21415-2026 -2- However, the 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/amrik-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-punjab-haryana-2