# AMIT BHANDARI AND ORS. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-17
Citation: CRM-M 65242/2024
Petitioner: AMIT BHANDARI AND ORS.
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=65242&case_year=2024&order_date=2026-07-17&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-65242-2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 261 CRM-M-65242-2024(O&M) Date of Decision :17.07.2026 AMIT BHANDARI AND ORS. ......PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Raghav Grover, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Deepali Verma, Asstt. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Kamalpreet Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): 1. The present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, has been filed for quashing of FIR No.396 dated 19.07.2017, under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Faridabad Kotwali, District Faridabad (Annexure P-1), along with all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom. The quashing of FIR has been sought on the basis of compromise between the parties, dated 02.12.2024, (Annexure P-2). 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Case file has also been perused carefully. 3. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.03.2026, had directed the parties to appear before the learned trial Court for recording of VIPIN KUMAR 2026.07.18 16:00 I attest to the accurac

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/amit-bhandari-and-ors-vs-state-of-haryana-and-anr