# AMAN vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CRM-M 38295/2026
Petitioner: AMAN
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=38295&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-38295-2026(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (157) CRM-M-38295-2026(O&M) Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 Aman ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Rahul Sangwan, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R.K. Ambavta, DAG, Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) for quashing of the order dated 30.09.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panipat, whereby the petitioner has been declared as a Proclaimed Person in case FIR No. 27 dated 03.02.2021 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC (corresponding to Sections 318, 338(5), 336(3), 340 of BNS) and Section 61 of the Excise Act, registered at Police Station Ishrana, District Panipat, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was regularly appearing before the trial Court. However, due to his permanent shifting of residence along with his family to

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/aman-vs-state-of-haryana-punjab-haryana-2