# AKASH vs UT OF CHANDIGARH

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-10
Citation: INCOMP 1254/2026
Petitioner: AKASH
Respondent: UT OF CHANDIGARH

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=INCOMP&case_no=1254&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-10&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH INCOMP-1254-2026 Date of Decision:-10.07.2026 AKASH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF UT OF CHANDIGARH .....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Suresh Kumar Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) The aforesaid petition as filed on 24.02.2026 by Mr. Suresh Kumar Dhiman, Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry. 2. As per Rule 9, Chaper I, Part A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, in which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refilling after removal of objections. On failure to do the needful, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. 3. Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate PRIYANKA 2026.07.10 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document INCOMP-1254-2026 -2- to collect the case for re-filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in u

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/akash-vs-ut-of-chandigarh