# AARTI SINDHU vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CRM-M 14127/2026
Petitioner: AARTI SINDHU
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=14127&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-14127-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 CRM-M-14127-2026 Date of decision : 14.07.2026 Date of uploading : 14.07.2026 Aarti Sindhu ………….Petitioner Versus State Of Haryana AND ANOTHER …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Aman Gautam, Advocate for the complainant. --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.439 dated 21.10.2024 under Sections 406, 420 of the IPC and Sections 10 & 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, registered at Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal. 2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the present petition by the petitioner) is as follows:- “At present, a complaint bearing No. 2111-PESHI dated 06.09.2024, 600-5P Dt. 19.10.2024, was received through post from the office of the Superintendent of Police, Kaithal, after inquiry from Economic Cell Kaithal vide Memo No. 234- EOW dated 07.09.2024 at Police Station Pundri. The gist of the complain

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/aarti-sindhu-vs-state-of-haryana