# VINEET vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-15
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-4871/2025 2026:DHC:338
Petitioner: VINEET
Respondent: THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60815012026BA48712025_193602.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4871/2025 VINEET .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi and Ms. Ritika, Advocates. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SHO/Insepctor M.P. Singh. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 1044/2022 of PS Mangolpuri for offence under Section 302/307/147/148/149/120B IPC and 25/27 Arms Act. 2. In furtherance of last order, SHO/Inspector M.P. Singh has appeared along with the investigation file. IO has not appeared and is stated to be on his way. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State. 3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant BAIL APPLICATION 4871/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, 4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that the entire incident of stabbing is captured in video footage, which does not depict the accused/applicant. The said video footage is shown to me as well as to learned APP assisted by the SHO and admi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/vineet-vs-the-state-nct-of-delhi