# TAUSEIF KHAN vs STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-30
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-401/2026 2026:DHC:747
Petitioner: TAUSEIF KHAN
Respondent: STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60830012026BA4012026_172007.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 30.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 401/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3103/2026 TAUSEIF KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pushkar Priyadarshi, Advocate versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/Inspector Rajinder Singh, PS Vivek Vihar CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 304/2020 of PS Vivek Vihar for offence under Section 302/201/120B/34 IPC. 2. Broadly speaking, prosecution case is that in presence of the first informant Poonam, a third gender, another third gender Reshma was killed by way of multiple stabbing by the accused/applicant and his father and brother-in-law. In the FIR, Poonam specifically named all three assailants. Father of the accused/applicant was apprehended on the spot while the accused/applicant and his brother-in-law fled. Knives used by all three assailants were recovered. BAIL APPLN. 401/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, 3. Against the above backdrop, learned counsel f

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/tauseif-khan-vs-state-n-c-t-of-delhi