# MR. RAJKUMAR SABU vs MS. KAUSHALYA DEVI SABU & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-31
Citation: CS(COMM)-761/2016 2026:DHC:786
Petitioner: MR. RAJKUMAR SABU
Respondent: MS. KAUSHALYA DEVI SABU & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68731012026SC7612016_223514.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 31.01.2026 CS(COMM) 97/2020 SABU TRADE PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Versus RAJ KUMAR SABU & ANR .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case For the Plaintiff : Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi & Ms. Ananya Sanjiv Saraogi, Advocates. For the Defendants : Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, Ms. Vindhya Mehra, Mr. Samridhi Bhatt & Ms. Nupur Kumar, Advocates for Defendant No.1. CS(COMM) 761/2016 MR. RAJKUMAR SABU .....Plaintiff Versus MS. KAUSHALYA DEVI SABU & ORS. .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case For the Plaintiff : Mr. Divyakant Lahoti, Ms. Vindhya Mehra, Mr. Samridhi Bhatt & Ms. Nupur Kumar, Advocates. For the Defendants : Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi & Ms. Ananya Sanjiv Saraogi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA 1. The core controversy between the Parties in CS(COMM) 97/2020 (“Suit”) and CS(COMM) 761/2016 (“Connected Suit”) is about the proprietorship, adoption and use of the Mark ‘SACHAMOTI’ in relation to Sabudana and allied edible products. FACTUAL BACKGROUND: 2. The Suit earlier numbered as OS No. 148 of 2016 and filed b

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/mr-rajkumar-sabu-vs-ms-kaushalya-devi-sabu-ors