# MOHD. ARMAN @ MANNU vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-12
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-100/2026 2026:DHC:211
Petitioner: MOHD. ARMAN @ MANNU
Respondent: THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60812012026BA1002026_182847.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 12.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 100/2026 & CRL.M.A. 864/2026 MOHD. ARMAN @ MANNU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State with SI Ashish Sharma, PS Nand Nagri CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant, suffering incarceration since 13.10.2024, seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 669/2024 of PS Nand Nagri for offence under Section 109(1) of BNS and 25/27 Arms Act. 2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he inflicted three knife blows on the injured complainant de facto. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for accused/applicant and affirmed by the IO/SI Ashish Sharma that the injured complainant de facto in his testimony has not supported prosecution case. However, learned prosecutor BAIL APPLICATION 100/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 4. Considering the above 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/mohd-arman-mannu-vs-the-state-nct-of-delhi