# M/S OM NANOTECH PVT LTD vs M/S VENUS COMPUTER SERVICES

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-30
Citation: CM(M)-1158/2018 2026:DHC:765
Petitioner: M/S OM NANOTECH PVT LTD
Respondent: M/S VENUS COMPUTER SERVICES

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68930012026CMM11582018_122420.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026 CM(M) 1158/2018 & CM APPL. 39097/2018 M/S OM NANOTECH PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arpit Sharma, Advocate. versus M/S VENUS COMPUTER SERVICES .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Bhati, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 05th April, 2018, passed by the trial court in Civil Suit No. 93446/16, whereby the application filed under Order VII Rule 14, seeking permission to place certain documents on record, has been dismissed. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner argued that the documents sought to be placed on record are relevant for the proper adjudication of the case. These documents could not be filed earlier due to the negligence of the previous counsel and the erstwhile Authorized Representative of the petitioner company. 5. Per contra, learned Counsel for the respondent has argued that the application has been filed only wit

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/m-s-om-nanotech-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-venus-computer-services