# LAJPAT ARYA vs M/S SHINE STAR ELECTRONICS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-28
Citation: CM(M)-222/2026 2026:DHC:672
Petitioner: LAJPAT ARYA
Respondent: M/S SHINE STAR ELECTRONICS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68928012026CMM2222026_165228.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 28th January, 2026 CM(M) 222/2026 LAJPAT ARYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Gaur and Ms. Meghna Bali, Advs. versus M/S SHINE STAR ELECTRONICS .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 5728/2026 (for Exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 222/2026 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “Issue appropriate directions to the Ld. ADJ, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, to pronounce orders within a time-bound period on the Petitioner’s application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in CIV DJ/560/2023” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has been served through his counsel. 5. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application filed under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) on behalf of the petitioner has not yet been decided, despite arguments having been heard on multiple dates, i.e., 24th O

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/lajpat-arya-vs-m-s-shine-star-electronics