# LAIQ AHAMAD ALIAS SAENVE ALAM vs STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-07
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-37/2026 2026:DHC:83
Petitioner: LAIQ AHAMAD ALIAS SAENVE ALAM
Respondent: STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60807012026BA372026_174749.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 07.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 37/2026, CRL.M.A. 403/2026, 404/2026 & 405/2026 LAIQ AHAMAD ALIAS SAENVE ALAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bibek Tripathi and Mr. Subhakar Tiwari, Advocates. versus STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Narender Singh, PS CR Park. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.357/2024 of PS Chitranjan Park for offence under Section 309(6)/310(2)/ 311/317(3)/61(2)/3(5) BNS and Section 25/27 Arms Act. 2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Narender Singh. 3. Broadly speaking, the complainant de facto is in the business of jewellery and he alleged robbery at his house in which 3-4 persons carrying BAIL APPLICATION 37/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569a f3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, KATHPALIA st=Delhi, 4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that the manner in which the offence has been alleged is completely unbelievable as it is not believable 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/laiq-ahamad-alias-saenve-alam-vs-state-of-gnct-of-delhi