# KAUSHLENDER BHARDWAJ vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-21
Citation: W.P.(CRL)-222/2026 2026:DHC:510
Petitioner: KAUSHLENDER BHARDWAJ
Respondent: THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60821012026CRLW2222026_181401.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21.01.2026 W.P.(CRL) 222/2026 KAUSHLENDER BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajnish, Mr. Rahul and Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC with IO/ASI Deshpal, PS Narela. Mr. Deepak, Advocate, for injured with injured in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 639/2022 of Police Station Narela for the offence under Section 279/337 IPC on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. Learned ASC accepts notice and on instructions of IO/ASI, Deshpal Singh submits that State has no objection if this petition is allowed. 3. The complainant de facto identified by the IO also is present along with his counsel and accepts notice. W.P.(CRL) 222/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, 4. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the petitioner is that he was driving his car in a rash and negligent manner and hit against the complainant de fact

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/kaushlender-bhardwaj-vs-the-state-nct-of-delhi-anr