# INNOCENTI SA vs EXAMINER OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-31
Citation: C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM)-76/2024 2026:DHC:784
Petitioner: INNOCENTI SA
Respondent: EXAMINER OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68731012026CAT762024_223701.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement Delivered on: 31.01.2026 C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024, I.A. 45128/2024&I.A. 45132/2024 INNOCENTI SA .....Appellant versus EXAMINER OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Dr. Sheetal Vohra, Mr. Rahul Dwivedi, Mr. Sridharan Rajan Ramkumar, Ms. Annanya Mehan, Mr. Ashutosh & Ms. Sakshi Rathore, Advocates. For the Respondents : Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC along with Mr. Mayank Sansanwal & Mr. Om Ram, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Apoorva Maheshwari, Ms. Bhavya Gupta & Ms. Priyanshi Bhageria, Advocates for Respondent No.4. W.P.(C)-IPD 54/2025, CM 223/2025 & CM 224/2025 AUGUST VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent 1. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGEMENT TEJAS KARIA, J 1. By way of this common Judgement, C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024 (“Appeal”), W.P.(C)-IPD 54/2025 (“WP 54”) and W.P.(C)-IPD 56/2025 (“WP 56”) are decided in terms of the agreement between the Parties as recorded in order dated 16.10.2025. 2. The Appeal has b

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/innocenti-sa-vs-examiner-of-trademarks-anr