# GULZAR vs THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-01-27
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-4481/2025 2026:DHC:630
Petitioner: GULZAR
Respondent: THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60827012026BA44812025_172842.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4481/2025 GULZAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Mishra, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SHO/Inspector Vishwanath, PS NDRS. + BAIL APPLN. 4515/2025 GULZAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Mishra, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SHO/Inspector Vishwanath, PS NDRS. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR Nos. 106/2025 & BAIL APPLICATIONS 4481/2025 & 4515/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, 2. To begin with, last order passed in these bail applications is extracted below: “1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 106/2025 and FIR No. 107/2025 of PS New Delhi Railway Station for offence under Section 305(c)/317(c)/3(5) BNS. 2. At the outset, it is shocking to hear from learned counsel for accused/applicant that during pendency of these bail applications, the

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/gulzar-vs-the-state-of-n-c-t-of-delhi