# BHUSHAN RAJENDRA MORE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ANR

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2026-01-19
Citation: WP/11071/2023
Petitioner: BHUSHAN RAJENDRA MORE
Respondent: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ANR

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6Im5JZ0dxWXQwWHJoVElDTHV2QVhVdXc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiZ2UwMHlnbkFRUURLOFlTMlZBVTRQZS9hUjBCbDd0aUZhekkyanVUVTRETzMxYnBnYThkbEwvVXlFOW1KOVY1NVlFbitvdE44bHdMMGNiWTJxMTJlenc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjdkOGY4OTA1ZGIyZWE1MjI5NjM5NTY4MDcyMzBhMzBiZmUwYTU3ODNkZmY5MzEzYTM3Yjk2NTYxNWQyMzk0NzkiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782770206&signature=ba25ff4897c54494ec8c1781df45384e3271c3e798806eb3ccf507e519530f93)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

Ingale 31-wp-11071-23.odt 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned AGP appearing for the Respondent-State. The caste claim of the Petitioner as belonging to the ‘Koli Mahadev, Scheduled Tribe’ has been invalidated by the Scrutiny Committee. Inviting our attention to the impugned order, learned AGP in support of the impugned order submitted that the Scrutiny Committee has for cogent reasons invalidated the caste claim of the Petitioner. Learned counsel for the Petitioner in support of the caste claim submitted that the Scrutiny Committee was not justified in discarding the 1 Ingale 31-wp-11071-23.odt caste validity certificate issued to the Petitioner’s father on 31/08/2007 [page 83 of the Petition]. 2. We have considered the rival submissions. Having gone through the findings of the Scrutiny Committee in the impugned order, we find that the material in the form of caste validity certificate of the Petitioner’s father has been discarded on the ground that there are discrepancies in the entries relating to the caste of the Petitioner’s father when the matter was considered by the Scrutiny Committee which issued the certificate of validity to the Petitioner’s father. 3.

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/january/bhushan-rajendra-more-vs-state-of-maharashtra-thru-secretary-tribal-development-dept-and-anr