# WRIT - C No. 3954 of 2026 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-02-24
Citation: WRIT - C No. 3954 of 2026 at Allahabad
Petitioner: WRIT - C No. 3954 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=76862)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 3954 of 2026 Akhilesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Rpasad Kushwaha, Radheshyam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present writ petition is to direct the Respondent No.2 namely Tehsildar, Chunar, District Mirzapur to decide the mutation Case No.RST/7393/ 2021 CNR No.T202116530407393 (Neha Kumari Vs. Radhe Shyam) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period. 4. It is argued by the counsel for the petitioner that as per provisions contained under sub-rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, such kind of applications should be de

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/writ-c-no-3954-of-2026-at-allahabad