# WRIT - A No. 635 of 2026 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-02-18
Citation: WRIT - A No. 635 of 2026 at Allahabad
Petitioner: WRIT - A No. 635 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=80995)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 635 of 2026 Aviral .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Piyush Tripathi Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Shiv Sagar Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Piyush Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised regarding maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the writ petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy for approaching the Central Administrative Tribunal by filing original application under Section 19(V) of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. Since the writ petitioner claim for compassionate appointment has been rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner could not dispute the said proposition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of leaving it open for the writ petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction while filing original application in view of the judgment in L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India : AIR 1997 Supreme Court 1125. (Vika

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/writ-a-no-635-of-2026-at-allahabad