# VICTORIA CROSS INDIA PVT LTD vs VICTRORINOX AG

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-17
Citation: RFA(COMM)-532/2024 2026:DHC:1458-DB
Petitioner: VICTORIA CROSS INDIA PVT LTD
Respondent: VICTRORINOX AG

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75217022026RFAC5322024_103902.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(COMM) 532/2024 & CM APPL. 72308/2024 VICTORIA CROSS INDIA PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, Adv. with Mr. Harsh Pratap Shahi, Mr. Areeb Amanullah, Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advs. versus VICTRORINOX AG .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal, Mr. Rishi Bansal and Ms. Shruti Manchanda, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 17.02.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. CM APPL. 72307/2024 (delay) 1. By this application, the appellant in RFA(Comm) 532/2024 seeks condonation of delay of 195 days in filing the present appeal, which has been preferred under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against a judgment dated 23 March 2024 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial-08), Tis Hazari Courts1. 1 “learned Commercial Court” hereinafter 2. As the earlier application filed for condonation of delay did not contain sufficient particulars, Mr. Jaitley, learned Counsel for the appellant, sought and was granted permission to file an additional affidavit explaining the delay of 195 days in preferring the appeal. He has d

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/victoria-cross-india-pvt-ltd-vs-victrorinox-ag