# VEENA DEVI vs GAYATRI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-20
Citation: CM(M)-1865/2024 2026:DHC:1522
Petitioner: VEENA DEVI
Respondent: GAYATRI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68920022026CMM18652024_163447.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :20th February, 2026 CM(M) 1865/2024 & CM APPL. 8809/2024 VEENA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Piyush M. Dwivedi, Mr. Shubham Yadav, Mr. Chetanya Baweja, Mr. Abhishek Dwivedi, Advocates. versus GAYATRI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vishal Bakshi, Advocate (through VC). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the orders passed by the learned Trial Court in Civ DJ 647/2021, namely: (i) order dated 02nd November, 2022, whereby the petitioner/ defendant’s opportunity to file the written statement was closed; (ii) order dated 20th July, 2023, whereby the petitioner/defendant was proceeded ex parte; and (iii) order dated 02nd January, 2024, whereby the petitioner’s application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking setting aside of the ex parte order, was dismissed. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection if the imp

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/veena-devi-vs-gayatri