# TEERTHANKAR MAHAVEER UNIVERSITY vs HARMEET SINGH AND ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-25
Citation: CM(M)-437/2026 2026:DHC:1679
Petitioner: TEERTHANKAR MAHAVEER UNIVERSITY
Respondent: HARMEET SINGH AND ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68925022026CMM4372026_114012.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25thFebruary, 2026 CM(M) 437/2026, CM APPL. 12914/2026 &CM APPL. 12915/2026 TEERTHANKAR MAHAVEER UNIVERSITY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Annirudh Sharma and Mr. Ankit Swami, Advs. versus HARMEET SINGH AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 assailing the order dated 15th July, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in Civil Suit No. 490/2021, whereby the evidence of the petitioner/defendant has been closed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears on advance notice and accepts notice. 4. The matter is taken up for hearing with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 5. Heard. Record perused. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 15th July, 2025, the witness/DW-1 could not be examined as the main counsel was unwell. It is 7. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has argued that the learned Tr

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/teerthankar-mahaveer-university-vs-harmeet-singh-and-anr