# TAMILARASAN RAJENDRAN vs REHABILITATION COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-23
Citation: W.P.(C)-2532/2026 2026:DHC:1838
Petitioner: TAMILARASAN RAJENDRAN
Respondent: REHABILITATION COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59623022026CW25322026_131059.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2532/2026 Date of Decision: 23.02.2026 TAMILARASAN RAJENDRAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Chawla and Mr. Karan Dua, Advocates. (Thr. VC) versus REHABILITATION COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 12359/2026 (EXEMPTION) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2532/2026 3. The petitioner, a resident of the State of Tamil Nadu, through the present petition seeks a direction to the respondent no. 1 i.e., Rehabilitation Council of India, to consider and decide the petitioner‟s complaint dated 06.01.2025 (hereinafter “said Complaint”), alleging professional misconduct on the part of one Dr. Priya Puri, a clinal psychologist resident 4. Respondent no. 2 is stated to be the therapist engaged by the petitioner‟s wife. It is averred that, during the pendency of matrimonial proceedings between the petitioner and his wife, a Court-appointed expert sought information from respondent No. 2, pursuant to which she is stated to have furnished categorical opinions

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/tamilarasan-rajendran-vs-rehabilitation-council-of-india-and-anr