# SHRI GIAN CHAND RALHAN vs SHRI GURVINDER SINGH BAKSHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-17
Citation: CM(M)-238/2026 2026:DHC:1386
Petitioner: SHRI GIAN CHAND RALHAN
Respondent: SHRI GURVINDER SINGH BAKSHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68917022026CMM2382026_170738.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHIAT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17th February, 2026 CM(M) 238/2026 SHRI GIAN CHAND RALHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Gupta, Ms. Surbhi Gupta and Mr. Anant Gupta, Advocates. versus SHRI GURVINDER SINGH BAKSHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumeet Kaul and Mr. Himanshu Singhal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM(M) 238/2026 & CM APPL. 6415/2026 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 14th November, 2025, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS DJ No. 357/2020, whereby the question put by the petitioner/defendant to the PW1 (respondent) in his cross-examination, regarding receiving of the notice marked as PW1/DX1 has been declined. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. The relevant portion of the cross-examination of PW1 dated 14th November, 2025 reads as follows: “At this stage, ld. counsel for the defendant has shown the copy of the purported notice under Order XII rule 8 CPC 5. This Court has also perused the alleged notice placed on record by the

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/shri-gian-chand-ralhan-vs-shri-gurvinder-singh-bakshi