# SANDHYA vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-09
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-571/2026 2026:DHC:1050
Petitioner: SANDHYA
Respondent: STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60809022026BA5712026_180127.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 571/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4319/2026 SANDHYA .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given). versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The applicant/accused seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 344/2025 of Police Station Rajouri Garden for the offence under Section 318(4)/336(3)/ 340(2)/338/61(2)/3(5) BNS. 2. Broadly speaking, the interim bail sought by the accused/applicant is on the ground of illness of her two year old child. The only allegation against the accused/applicant in the FIR is: “we suspect the wife Mrs. Sandhya and father of Mr. Varun Arora, Mr.Krishan Gopal Arora who are conspirators in this fraud.” 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant has taken me through record especially the alleged illness of the two year old daughter of the accused/applicant. BAIL APPLN. 571/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH 4. Learned prosecutor opposes the interim bail on the ground that according to the report filed before t

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/sandhya-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi