# RS MEENA vs MCD AND ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-02-25
Citation: REVIEW PET.-81/2026 2026:DHC:1654-DB
Petitioner: RS MEENA
Respondent: MCD AND ORS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75025022026REVIEWPET812026_160816.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 18.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 25.02.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 25.02.2026 W.P.(C) 3933/2010 RS MEENA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Tamali Wad, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Varyam Pandey, Mr. Himanshu Upadhyay & Ms. Palak Garg, Advs. versus MCD AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Ahuja Panel Counsel MCD with Mr. Saket Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr Rajesh Yadav Sr. Adv & Ms Ruchira Vasisht, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Ruchir Mishrra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kr Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra, Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advs. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.: CM APPL. 10130/2026 [exemption] 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. 3. The present Review Petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking review of the order/judgment dated 12.01.2026 passed by this Court, whereby W.P.(C) 3933/2010 and W.P.(C) 5684/2010 were dismissed. 4. On a perusal of the Order dated 12.01.2026, it becomes evident that the counsel, who appeared on behalf of the Petitioner on 12.01.2026, did not make any submissions assuming that the

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/rs-meena-vs-mcd-and-ors