# MAHESH PURSHOTTAM MAURYA THROUGH THE CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MR.SUKHARILAL SAROJ AND ORS vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2026-02-16
Citation: FA/70/2012
Petitioner: MAHESH PURSHOTTAM MAURYA THROUGH THE CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MR.SUKHARILAL SAROJ AND ORS
Respondent: THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IjF5Wk5YNXZqbkw0Si85bHY4cUh4N2c9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiL01XYjV0akNRWGdoLzNsaG5oLy9KWWhENkRGbXBXbEQvaXQxalh4WCtVbjZRL2xZYmFMaHQxNzdMeVBTNWhGc1ZBQ0M1YjloUDJtOUc5WVNVc1RQZnc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjI4YjM5ZmJjMDQ2N2ZkMWE3MDgzZTI5MjI3MjUwMTk1Nzc4ZmJhNGJiNGJkNTBhZGExZmE5MjRiNmYzMTdkMjgiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782766111&signature=290bb5a63af80411d82f475f7aa54b095c60c1151c86142686bd5807b4701008)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

ppn 1 46.fa-70.12(j).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 1. Mahesh Purshottam Maurya of Mumbai, aged about 60 years, Occupation : Landlord, Indian Inhabitant, residing at SJK Near Nair Wadi, Saki Naka Kherani Road, Mumbai – 400 072 through the Constituted Attorney Mr. Sukharilal Saroj also of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant residing at SJK Compound, Survey No.41, C.T.S. No.156 (Part) of Village Mohili Saki Naka, Mumbai – 400 072 2. Radheshyam B. Kanojia 3. Jayram S. Saroj 4. Jamaluddin Khan of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitants, residing at SJK Compound, C.T.S. No.156, Village Mohili, Revenue Village: Saki Saki Naka, Mumbai – 400 072 ….Appellants (Org. Plaintiff Nos.1 to 3 & 5) Versus 1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, a Corporate Body duly incorporated under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, having its Head office at Mahapalika Building, Mahapalika Marg Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 2. Akram Hussain ppn 2 46.fa-70.12(j).doc 3. Shankar Chauhan 4. Shamshuddin Khan of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitants, residing at SJK Compound, C.T.S. No.156, Village Mohili, Revenue Village: Saki Saki Naka, Mumbai – 400 072 .…Respondents (Org. Defendants and Plaintiff Nos.4, 6 & 7) ---- Mr. R. R

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/february/mahesh-purshottam-maurya-through-the-constituted-attorney-mr-sukharilal-saroj-and-ors-vs-the-municipal-corporation-of-gr